Dismissed

Dharmendra Tanti v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Aug 2022CR. MISC./2550/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment rejects the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 363, 366, 314, and 304. The Court held that the thrust of the accusation was against the petitioner and the state opposed the prayer based on evidence and circumstantial proof of culpability.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected as the prosecution's case and circumstantial evidence support the charge.

Dharmendra Tanti Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2550 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2020 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dharmendra Tanti Son Of Bhanu Tanti Resident Of Village - Chamarbigha, P.S.- Shekhopur Sarai, Distt.- Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 24-08-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 314, 304 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that the

¶14

informant lived in Harnaut to earn his livelihood. It is alleged that on 02.01.2020, this petitioner enticed away the wife of the informant. Later on, the informant came

¶15

to know that his wife is lying dead in Jivan Jyoti Hospital, Biharsharif. It is further alleged that petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2550 of 2022(3) dt.24-08-2022 2/3

¶17

and the wife of the informant had love affairs and the deceased was also pregnant.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and only on suspicion, the petitioner has been roped in the present case. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State

¶20

on perusal of the case diary as well as F.I.R and the impugned order has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the witnesses during investigation have supported the prosecution version. There is also circumstantial evidence against the petitioner. The F.S.L report suggests that poisonous substances were detected.

¶21

Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2550 of 2022(3) dt.24-08-2022 3/3

¶23

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner

¶24

stands rejected.

¶25

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶26

Shageer/-

¶27

U T

Dharmendra Tanti v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Tanti v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dipendra Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Ridhi Singh @ Nidhi Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Tripurari Tiwary @ Manish Kashyap @ Tripurari Kr. Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar Mehta Vs the State of Bihar

Jai Prakash Yadav @ J.P Yadav and Others Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar