Allowed

Vicky Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 May 2022CR. MISC./25132/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application arising out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2021 at Bela Industrial, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under the Excise Act, 2016 for liquor-related offences, directed to furnish bond of Rs. 1,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Vicky Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25132 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2021 Thana- BELA INDUSTRIAL District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vicky Kumar, S/O Ashok Mahto R/O Village- Rambagh Maiasthan, P.S.Mithanpura, District- Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 20-05-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273/ 34 and Sections 30(a), 36 of the Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2022, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and has antecedent of one case.

¶14

Allegation is of recovery of 24.675 litre of liquor from the co-accused as it is alleged that petitioner fled from the place of occurrence.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot and his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25132 of 2022(2) dt.20-05-2022 2/2

¶17

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

¶18

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody,

¶19

charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and was not arrested from the spot, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bela P. S. Case No.03 of 2021.

¶20

The application stands allowed.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

vikash/-

¶23

U T

Vicky Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vicky Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Thakur@Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhinandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shailesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Dhajo Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Sah Vs The State of Bihar