Allowed

Hanuman Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2022CR. MISC./2220/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, noting his clean antecedents. The court directed that upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, he shall be enlarged on bail subject to specific conditions and furnishing of security.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks by furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Hanuman Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2220 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-782 Year-2015 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HANUMAN SINGH Son of Late Rajkishor Singh Resident of VillageDilawarpur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Samrendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-07-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

State.

¶14

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code and u/s 27 of Arms Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, FIR named accused persons intercepted and assaulted the informant.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence and he has not named this petitioner. The name of petitioner has transpired in this case during the course of investigation. Present case is counter blast of Bihta PS case No. 780/2015 in which petitioner was a witness.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2220 of 2022(2) dt.25-07-2022 2/2

¶18

Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the

¶20

prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶21

Considering the facts of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta PS case No. 782/ 2015, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C.

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

BKS/-

¶24

U T

Hanuman Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanuman Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Raushan @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Gupta @ Khagendra Gupta @ Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar