Allowed

Rajesh Raushan @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2022CR. MISC./14972/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court, hearing an anticipatory bail petition, granted bail to the petitioner pending registration under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, conditioned on arrest or surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail enlarged if arrested or surrendered within six weeks upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

Rajesh Raushan @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14972 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-409 Year-2021 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJESH RAUSHAN @ RAJESH KUMAR SON OF LATE MAUJI RAM R/O VILLAGE- SARANGPUR (PURVI), P.S.- TAJPUR (HALAI O.P.) AND DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aditya Prakash Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 22-07-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶11

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30 (A) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, 1355.40 liter of illicit liquor has been recovered from a Tata Magic and 303 liter of illicit liquor from a Maruti car. Name of petitioner has transpired in the case on the basis of disclosure made by coaccused, Kailash Ram.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14972 of 2022(3) dt.22-07-2022 2/2

¶15

concerned with the alleged recovery. Petitioner is neither driver nor owner of the vehicle in question.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

Considering the facts of the case and nature of accusation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act-II, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur (Halai OP) PS case No.409/ 2021, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶19

BKS/-

¶20

U T

Rajesh Raushan @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Raushan @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Mantu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Satyanarayan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bharat Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar