Allowed

Manjay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Mar 2022CR. MISC./19379/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of assaulting the informant and damaging property under various IPC sections, directing their release subject to furnishing a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on anticipatory bail by furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each with two sureties to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran.

Manjay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19379 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-387 Year-2020 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANJAY KUMAR Son of Baleshwar Mahto Resident of Village - Karinga Musehari, Police Station - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran.

¶5

Vijay Kumar Son of Baleshwar Mahto Resident of Village - Karinga Musehari, Police Station - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran.

¶6

Pankaj kumar Son of Ram Laxan Mahto Resident of Village - Karinga Musehari, Police Station - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran.

¶7

Bala Mahto Son of Late Lalji Mahto Resident of Village - Karinga Musehari, Police Station - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran.

¶8

Ram Laxan Mahto son of Late Lalji Mahto Resident of Village - Karinga Musehari, Police Station - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ankur Prakash Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 25-03-2022

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶16

the learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 387 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 143, 323, 307, 427 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

The accusation against the petitioners is general

¶19

and omnibus. They are said to have assaulted the informant

¶20

and one Chandan Kumar, both of whom appear to have

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19379 of 2021(2) dt.25-03-2022 2/3

¶22

received only simple injuries.

¶23

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have been made accused in this case because of a Complaint Case No. 2073 of 2020 having been lodged against the informant by the wife of petitioner no. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is a dispute between the two families and the petitioners are agnates of the informant. The accusation against petitioners of having damaged the vehicle and of taking away valuable belongings is overtly exaggerated.

¶24

The petitioners are persons of clean antecedents.

¶25

Considering the afore-noted submissions, the

¶26

petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 387 of

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19379 of 2021(2) dt.25-03-2022 3/3

¶28

2020, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438

¶29

(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure

¶30

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶31

sunilkumar/-

¶32

U T

Manjay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Shankar Vs the State of Bihar

Sheo Pujan Baitha @ Sheo Parsan Baitha @ Ram Prasann Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sachin Malakar @ Sachin Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Islam Vs the State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar