Allowed

Islam v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Mar 2022CR. MISC./19243/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Islam, Asmati, and Akbar in PS Case No. 190/2019, directing them to report or appear in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, within four weeks upon arrest or surrender, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release petitioners on bail within four weeks of arrest/surrender upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount to the CMJ, Araria.

Islam Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19243 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2019 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Islam, Gender Male, aged about 60 years, Son of Late Sabdul

¶5

Asmati, Gender Female, aged about 58 years, wife of Islam

¶6

Akbar, Gender Male, aged about 22 years, Son of Islam All resident of village Majhwa, P.S. - Jokihat, District - Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Ravish, Adv. Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 25-03-2022

¶14

Heard Mr. Kumar Ravish, learned advocate for the petitioners and learned APP.

¶15

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 190 of 2019 dated 12.05.2019 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 379, 447, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are said to have assaulted the Informant but she has received only simple injuries. The petitioner no.3, who is the son of petitioner nos. 1 & 2, is only stated to have divested the Informant’s son of his silver necklace.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19243 of 2021(2) dt.25-03-2022 2/2

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is a counter version of the occurrence also and the other persons of this case against whom there is a specific charge of assault have been granted anticipatory bail.

¶19

Considering the aforenoted facts and taking into account the clean antecedent of the petitioners, they are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 190 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶21

rishi/-

¶22

U T

Islam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Islam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Shankar Vs the State of Bihar

Sheo Pujan Baitha @ Sheo Parsan Baitha @ Ram Prasann Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sachin Malakar @ Sachin Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Manjay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar