Petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal of application, asserting the petitioner was apprehended by police. Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19273 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2021 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul
======================================================
VIKASH KUMAR Son of Ramanand Yadav Resident of Village - Tamkulha, Ward No. 15, Police Station- Jadia, District - Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP
for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application as the petitioner has been apprehended by the police during pendency of this application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
ajay/-
U T
Vikash Kumar
The State of Bihar
Laxmi Kumari
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
