Dismissed

Pawan Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Oct 2022CR. MISC./8839/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Section 498A and 307 IPC. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within six weeks to seek regular bail.

What did the court decide?

The petition for anticipatory bail has been rejected and the petitioner has been directed to surrender within six weeks to seek regular bail.

Pawan Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8839 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2021 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran

¶3

====================================================== PAWAN SAH S/o Chhatu Sah R/o village- Medhuka, P.S.- Sahajitpur, District- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

The State of Bihar

¶5

Sunita Kumari W/o Pawan Sah, D/o Raj Kishor Sah R/o village- Bhatoura, P.S.- Taraiya, Distt.- Saran at Chapra

¶6

... ... Opposite Parties.

¶7

====================================================== Appearance :

¶8

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Renu Kumari ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 18-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Taraiya P.S. Case No. 87/21 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A & 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

All the accused persons including this petitioner is said to have tied the legs and hand of the daughter of the informant thrown from roof and asked to sleep with the friend

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8839 of 2022(3) dt.18-10-2022 2/2

¶15

of the petitioner. They also demanded rupees two lakhs.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

¶17

that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is the husband of the daughter of the informant and he always ready to keep her with full honor and dignity. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

¶18

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the considering the nature of the offence committed by the petitioner in association of other coaccused, he does not deserve anticipatory bail.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

Trivedi/- U T

Pawan Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rishikesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shamim Ahmad @ Samim Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Jahangir Ansari Vs the State of Bihar

MD Saiful @ Shamim Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar