Dismissed
Suresh Yadav v. the State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./18623/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18623 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2020 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya
======================================================
Suresh Yadav Son of Ramswarup Yadav Resident of village - Lodipur, P.S. - Paraiya, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Vijaya Laxmi Srivastva, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 27-07-2022
Heard Mrs. Vijaya Laxmi Srivastava, the learned
counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, the learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No. 13 of 2020 under sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 379 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the FIR, the informant has alleged that amongst other it was the petitioner herein who gave ‘sword’ blow on the head of his brother causing injury to him. He further submits that other accused persons also assaulted him as also damaged his vehicle. It was only with the intervention of the police, the alleged ‘Jaam’ was removed and the informant and others saved themselves.
Taking into account the fact that specific allegation
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18623 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 2/2
has been made against the petitioner herein who has inflicted ‘sword’ injury on the head of the informant’s brother in January, 2020 whereas the petitioner chose to come into judicial custody two years later on 5.1.2022, this Court is not inclined to grant him the privilege of bail which is accordingly rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U T
Suresh Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court