Ajay Sah @ Dishtu v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court rejected immediate bail petition in a case involving liquor offence due to criminal antecedents but directed lower court to grant bail after framing of charges.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; release on bail directed after framing of charge.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1804 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2021 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran
======================================================
AJAY SAH @ DISHTU Son of Late Ram Lal Sah Resident of VillageInayatpur, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran at Chapra.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Asha Kumari ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 22-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application of the petitioner accused of offences under IPC and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act should be allowed.
Whether the bail application should be allowed immediately or after framing of charges considering criminal antecedents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajay Sah @ DishTU
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Prabhat Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court