Allowed

Suraj Ram @ Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Dom v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jul 2022CR. MISC./17519/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of a petitioner charged with snatching a mobile phone on a train and in judicial custody since September 2021. It granted bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under five conditional restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to four specific conditions of appearance and non-commission of offences.

Suraj Ram @ Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Dom Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17519 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2021 Thana- PATNA GRP CASE District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Suraj Ram @ Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Dom S/o Late Mundrika Ram R/o village- Yarpur, Ambedkar Colony, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Miss.Gulnar Begum, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 28-07-2022

¶15

Heard Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Miss. Gulnar Begum, learned APP for the State.

¶16

Pursuant to the last order dated 21.7.2022, a supplementary affidavit has been filed to complete the incomplete narration that was made in para-3 of the bail application, according to which, the petitioner has five criminal cases arising out of the same police station i.e. Gardanibagh Police station and of almost same nature of 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against him is that of snatching of the mobile in the train. He was apprehended on the spot, the mobile phone was

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17519 of 2022(3) dt.28-07-2022 2/3

¶19

recovered, he was thrashed, was taken into judicial custody and is in jail since 24.9.2021 (as stated in para-15 of the bail application).

¶20

Taking into account the aforesaid fact that the petitioner is in custody since 24.9.2021 and the charge-sheet stands submitted in the matter, this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail but with certain conditions in view of the fact that he has five criminal antecedents of the same nature.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with G.R.P. Patna Jn. P.S. Case No. 302 of 2021 subject to the following conditions:

¶22

(i) one of the bailors should be the family members of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶23

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

¶24

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for one year to mark his presence;

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17519 of 2022(3) dt.28-07-2022 3/3

¶26

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

¶27

criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

¶28

to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶29

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Ravi/-

U T

Suraj Ram @ Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Dom v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Ram @ Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Dom v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadikul Miyan @ Sadikul Miya @ Sabikul Miyaz Vs The State of Bihar

Chandani Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Rajeshwar Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Raushan Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Sundar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar