Allowed

Surendra Saw v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Oct 2022CR. MISC./14300/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, village Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in a police case involving murder, attempted murder, and assault on an informant's brother. The court granted bail subject to conditions and a personal appearance before a Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on anticipatory bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad.

Surendra Saw Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14300 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2019 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Surendra Saw Son Of Late Raghunandan Saw Resident Of Village - Serthua, P.S. - Makhdumpur (Tehta), District - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Shankar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 12-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a

¶13

case registered for the offences punishable under

¶14

Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302, 427, 379,

¶15

504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

It is a case of abusing and assaulting to the

¶17

brother of the informant due to which he succumbed to injuries.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶19

petitioner that the petitioner being the Mukhiya of the

¶20

village, has falsely been implicated in the present case

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14300 of 2022(3) dt.12-10-2022 2/3

¶22

due to village politics. This fact is also supported by several independent witnesses. It is further submitted that petitioner was not sent up for trial and final form has been submitted but differing with the final form, cognizance has been taken against the petitioner. It is also submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation and there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶23

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Mukhdumpur P.S. Case No. 453 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14300 of 2022(3) dt.12-10-2022 3/3

¶25

under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶26

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶27

nirajkrs/-

¶28

U T

Surendra Saw v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Saw v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dipak Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Navratan Jhunjhunwala Vs the State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kaushal Kumar Singh @ Kausal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vikram Kumar Agrawal @ Bikram Kumar Agrawal Vs The State of Bihar