Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge oral order rejecting petitioner's anticipatory bail application in a rape case under IPC and POCSO. Court refused bail due to direct rape allegation and victim's consistent testimony despite claims of false implication.
What did the court decide?
Bail application for petitioner rejected due to direct allegation and victim's testimony.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14256 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Samastipur
======================================================
ARBIND KUMAR Son of Jagdish Das Resident of Village - Akbarpur Basudeopur, P.S. - Kalyanpur, District - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a rape alleged case.
Whether allegations of false implication and delayed FIR registration warrant exoneration at the bail stage.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arbind Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sunil Kumar Panwar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court