Court orally permitted withdrawal of the petitioner's anticipatory bail application because he had already been arrested. The application was disposed of as dismissed by withdrawal.
Permission is granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12379 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2022 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
GAUTAM KUMAR VERMA Son of Silesh Mehta Resident of VillageDadhpa Bigha, P.S.- Amba, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
2 16-05-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this anticipatory bail application as the petitioner has already been arrested by the police.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.)
Sanjay/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted for withdrawal of anticipatory bail application after petitioner was arrested.
Gautam Kumar Verma
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
