Allowed

Karan Patel @ Karan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 May 2022CR. MISC./2645/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, and 504/34 of the IPC. Bail was allowed subject to conditions including a bond amount and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a bond of Rs.25,000 and two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Karan Patel @ Karan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2645 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2021 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KARAN PATEL @ KARAN KUMAR S/o Late Kameshwar Patel Resident of Village - Thumma, P.S. - Runnisaidpur, Dist. - Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 13-05-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties through virtual Court proceedings.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A & 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2.,

¶14

is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2645 of 2022(2) dt.13-05-2022 2/2

¶17

keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar , reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182 .

¶18

In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.423/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.,

¶19

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or for one time settlement.

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

Trivedi/-

Karan Patel @ Karan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Patel @ Karan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balmiki Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Rajan Tiwari @ Rajan Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Uma Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Anand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Gurudayal Rajak Vs The State of Bihar