Allowed

Rupam Kumari v. the State of Bihar through the Department of Vigilance Bihar, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Patna HC14 Sept 2022CR. MISC./11171/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Patna granted the petitioner anticipatory bail in a forgery case involving Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120(B) IPC, directing her release on bail bonds and sureties if arrested within four weeks, subject to CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties if arrested within four weeks.

Rupam Kumari Vs the State of Bihar through the Department of… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11171 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2021 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rupam Kumari Wife Of Navin Kumar R/O Village And P.S.- Birpur, DistrictBegusarai

¶5

... ... Petitioner/S

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar Through The Department Of Vigilance Bihar, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

============== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s	===== :	=================================== Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
For the Vigilance ==============	: : =====	Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate Ms. Archana Palkar Khopde, Advocate ===================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 14-09-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Prosecution case in short is that the petitioner procured job of primary teacher on the basis of forged marksheet testimonials.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70434 of 2021. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11171 of 2022(3) dt.14-09-2022 2/2

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the Vigilance opposed the anticipatory bail.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Begusarai in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

Brajesh Kumar/- U T

Rupam Kumari v. the State of Bihar through the Department of Vigilance Bihar, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupam Kumari v. the State of Bihar through the Department of Vigilance Bihar, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Rustam Vs the State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Bhullu Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jogendra Kewat Vs The State of Bihar

Murari Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Abadh Kumar @ Harsh Kumar @ Harsh Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar