Allowed

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Sept 2022CR. MISC./10945/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, apprehending arrest in a liquor-related case. The court ordered release upon surrender within four weeks on furnishing bail bonds and complying with Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail on surrender within four weeks by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to conditions u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10945 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2020 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SURENDRA YADAV @ SURENDRA KUMAR YADAV Son of Budhan Yadav Resident of Village - Chhatapur, P.s.- Andhramath, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

3 13-09-2022

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State and perused the case diary.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and excise Act.

¶13

As alleged, it is a case of recovery of Nepali wine from the two motorcycles, one of which, was being driven by the petitioner.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the motorcycle in question does not belong to this petitioner as asserted in para-12 of the petition. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10945 of 2022(3) dt.13-09-2022 2/2

¶16

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case No. 96 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶19

Brajesh Kumar/- U T

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sujeet Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Tahir Vs The State of Bihar

Prithvi Kumar Gupta @ Prithvi Nath Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

MD Rustam Vs the State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Bhullu Vs The State of Bihar

Jibachchi Devi Vs the State of Bihar