Allowed

Ram Pravesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC23 May 2022CR. MISC./1107/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to Ram Pravesh Singh in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 302, 307, 341, 323, and 34 of the IPC. The petitioner, in custody since September 2021, had clean antecedents, while the co-accused was on bail and the informant was not an eyewitness.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Ram Pravesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1107 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2019 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Pravesh Singh Son Of Narayan Singh R/O Village- Makhdampur, P.S.Fatehpur, Dist.- Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 23-05-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted and is a person with clean antecedent.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that informant alleges that on 12.03.2019 a quarrel took place between his son (deceased) and two accused persons, namely, Ram Pravesh Singh (petitioner) alongwith Kaparphutta on account of dispute relating to fare of the auto. It is next alleged that the accused took the victim at the place of occurrence and assaulted him with fist and slaps due to which the victim had

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1107 of 2022(2) dt.23-05-2022 2/2

¶16

suffered intense pain in his abdomen and died during the course of treatment.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is not the eye witness to the occurrence and the entire allegation hinges around suspicion. It is next submitted that Sri Kant Singh @ Kaparphutta has been granted bail by order dated 18.11.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68200 of 2019.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted and is a person with clean antecedent, co-accused has been granted bail and informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 68 of 2019.

¶20

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶21

Ankit/-

¶22

Ram Pravesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pravesh Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhajo Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanu Alam @ Shahid Raja Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjan Yadav @ Rajan Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Bijendra Kumar Patel @ Vijendra Kumar Patel @ Piyush Patel Vs The State of Bihar