Partly allowed

Hari Nandan Sharma, v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Patna HC10 Mar 2021MJC/821/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A correction order rectifying a typographical error in a previous judgment where a writ petition number was misquoted as a contempt petition number, directing the restoration of the writ petition to the original file.

What did the court decide?

Correction of previous order to direct the restoration of the writ petition to the original file instead of a contempt petition bearing a different number.

Hari Nandan Sharma, Vs The State of Bihar through the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.821 of 2021

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21922 of 2019

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Hari Nandan Sharma, son of Sanichar Sharma, Resident of Village - Agropatti, Police Station - Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

¶6

Ram Prit Sharma, Son of Sanichar Sharma, Resident of Village - Agropatti, Police Station - Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

¶7

Janki Devi, Widow of Late Ganesh Sharma, Resident of Village - Agropatti, Police Station - Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Collector, Madhubani.

¶12

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Benipatti, P.S. - Benipatti, DistrictMadhubani.

¶13

The Executive Magistrate, Benipatti, P.S. - Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

¶14

¶15

The Circle Officer, Benipatti, P.S. - Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

¶16

Deep Lal Yadav, Son of Hanas Yadav, Resident of Village - Agropatti, Police Station - Agropatti, District- Madhubani.

¶17

Ramhit Yadav, Son of Deep Lal Yadav, Resident of Village - Agropatti, Police Station - Agropatti, District- Madhubani.

¶18

Shankar Yadav, Son of Deep Lal Yadav, Resident of Village - Agropatti, Police Station - Agropatti, District- Madhubani.

¶19

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶20

====================================================== Appearance :

¶21

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhas Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag)

¶22

======================================================

¶23

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶24

3 25-03-2021

¶25

The present petition has been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” to correct a typographical error, which has crept in the order dated 10.03.2021, particularly in the last paragraph of the said order to the following extent :-

¶26

“The present petition is allowed and it is

¶27

Patna High Court MJC No.821 of 2021(3) dt.25-03-2021 2/2

¶28

directed that the aforesaid contempt petition bearing M.J.C. no. 3658 of 2019 be restored to its original file.”

¶29

It is accordingly directed that the aforesaid sentence appearing in the last paragraph of the order dated 10.03.2021 be read as follows :-

¶30

“ The present petition is allowed and it is directed that the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. no. 21922 of 2019 be restored to its original file. ”

¶31

Accordingly, the time granted for removal of the

¶32

defects is also extended by a further period of four weeks from today.

¶33

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶34

rinkee/-

¶35

Hari Nandan Sharma, v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hari Nandan Sharma, v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nipu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Nishant Agrawal Vs the Union of India

Sanjay Kumar Alias Sanjay Kumar Barbari Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Jagla Yadav @ Jangla Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Saurav Kumar @ Bhagwan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar