Dismissed
Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCMJC/704/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners moved to withdraw a writ petition, seeking liberty to agitate grievances before concerned authorities. The High Court allowed withdrawal with liberty.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to agitate grievances before respondent authorities.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.704 of 2020
¶2
In
¶3
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19555 of 2019
¶4
======================================================
¶5
- Sunil Kumar Son of Late Yadunandan Mahto, Resident of Village- Mapha, Police Station- Atari, District- Gaya.
¶6
- Sudama Prasad Son of Late Hulas Mahto, Resident of Village- Mapha, Police Station- Atari, District- Gaya.
¶7
- Rajesh Kumar Son of Jagdish Mahto, Resident of Village- Mapha, Police Station- Atari, District- Gaya.
¶8
... ... Petitioner/s
¶9
Versus
¶10
- The State of Bihar through Mr. Vivek Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
¶11
- Ms. Asangba Chuba, the Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sunil Kumar Son of Late Yadunandan Mahto
- petitioner
Sudama Prasad Son of Late Hulas Mahto
- petitioner
Rajesh Kumar Son of Jagdish Mahto
- respondent
State of Bihar
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court