Disposed

Nag Narain Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Mar 2021MJC/538/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed that the disputed sum of back wages, amounting to Rs. 25,55,295/-, produced by the State and deposited per an undertaking, be kept in safe custody by the Registrar General. The petition was disposed of with liberty to revive upon dismissal of the pending appeal by the contemnors.

What did the court decide?

Ordered the disputed sum kept in safe custody by the Court to be disbursed subject to the outcome of appeal No.128 of 2021; petition disposed with liberty to revive if such appeal is dismissed.

Nag Narain Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.538 of 2020

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8471 of 2003

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Nag Narain Rai Son of Late Ramjatan Rai Resident of Village- Daudpur, P.S. Daudpur, District- Chhapra.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Sri Gupteshwar Pandey Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

Rakesh Rathi, Inspector General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Region, Patna.

¶11

Bachhu Singh Meena, Ex- Superintendent of Police, Nawadah.

¶12

Sri Hari Prasad, Superintendent of Police, Nawadah.

¶13

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma (Aag 3)

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶19

5 05-03-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prabhat Kr. Verma, the learned AAG 3 for the State.

¶20

The learned AAG-3 has produced a draft bearing no. 840876 dated 04.03.2021 for a sum of Rs. 25,55,295/-, as per the undertaking of the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, as recorded in the order dated 03.03.2021, in compliance of the judgment of this Court dated 19.04.2019, passed in C.W.J.C. no. 8471 of 2003, pertaining to the amount of arrears of back wages.

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the fact that the petitioner has already joined in pursuance to the

¶22

Patna High Court MJC No.538 of 2020(5) dt.05-03-2021 2/2

¶23

setting aside of the order of termination by this Court vide order dated 19.04.2019 and is also getting regular salary.

¶24

In view of the facts and circumstances, mentioned in the order of this Court dated 03.03.2021, I direct that the aforesaid draft dated 04.03.2021 be kept in safe custody by the Registrar General of this Court, which shall be disbursed, subject to the final outcome of the appeal filed by the contemnors bearing L.P.A. no. 128 of 2021.

¶25

The petition stands disposed off, however with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate interlocutory application for revival of the present petition, in case the aforesaid appeal bearing L.P.A. no. 128 of 2021 is dismissed.

¶26

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶27

rinkee/-

¶28

Nag Narain Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nag Narain Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Ram Vs The Chairman, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank

Gouri Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Minhaj Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Bharti Vs State of Bihar

M/s Naturals Dairy (P) Ltd. Vs The Bank of Baroda

Jeetan Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar