Dismissed

Prakash Kumar Tagore v. George Tagore

Patna HC23 Nov 2021C.Misc./117/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a miscellaneous petition filed by the petitioner in a 22-year-old pending probate case. The court held that the petition was filed merely to delay disposal and found no merit in the submissions after directing removal of stamp defects. The petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The miscellaneous petition was dismissed; defects were directed to be removed within one month.

Prakash Kumar Tagore Vs George Tagore — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.117 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Prakash Kumar Tagore S/o Late Helarian Bernard Tagore, R/o MohallaKrishchan Center, P.O. + P.S.- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran

¶4

... ... Petitioner Versus

¶5

George Tagore S/o Late Hilarian Bernard Tagore, R/o Mohalla- Krishchan Center, P.O.+P.S.- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran

¶6

===============	... ... Respondent =======================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ===============	: Mr.Nishant Kumar Sinha : Mr. ======================================
CORAM: HONOU PANDEY	RABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 23-11-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

It appears that the Probate Case No. 10/99 is pending in the court below for 22 years. A petition was filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeking permission to call for the registration No. of Scribe, who prepared the deed of will.

¶11

The learned court below has mentioned in its order itself that this is a very old case of year 1999 and the argument of the plaintiff in that case was concluded. Opposite party had also advanced their arguments. It has been mentioned in the

¶12

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.117 of 2021(2) dt.23-11-2021 2/2

¶13

impugned order that the present petition has been filed only in order to delay the disposal of the case.

¶14

I do not find any merit in the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶15

Accordingly, this miscellaneous petition is being dismissed.

¶16

Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶17

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J)

¶18

SONALI/- U

Prakash Kumar Tagore v. George Tagore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash Kumar Tagore v. George Tagore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyendra Sah Vs Shyam Bihari Prasad Lahakar

Asha Devi Vs Shri Madhurendra Kumar Singh

Suman Kumar Singh Vs Most. Ramdei Kuwar

Lalandhari Singh @ Tubu Singh @ Ravi Shankar Vs Lara Rai

Rajesh Kumar Vs Anita Kumari

Smt. Chandra Kala devi Vs Brahmdeo Singh