Disposed

Chandra Bhushan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2021CWJC/8163/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner approached for denial of MACP benefits despite receipt of other dues. Court disposed writ with liberty to seek MACP, directing authority to consider representation within four weeks and dispose reasoned order subsequently, ensuring payment within six weeks if due. Thin order granting liberty.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file MACP representation within four weeks; direction to dispose within four weeks and pay dues within six weeks.

Chandra Bhushan Thakur Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8163 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chandra Bhushan Thakur (Male), Aged about 60 years, Son of Damodar Thakur, Resident of Mohalla- Krishnapuri, Infront of Electric Office, Musapur, P.S. and District- Samastipur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Rural Institute of Higher Studies at Biraul, P.S.- Pusa, DistrictSamastipur.

¶9

The Accountant General, Bihar, Veer Chand Patel Path, Patna.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

==================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State	================================== : Mr. Kripa Nand Jha, Advocate : Ms. Shilpa Singh, GA 12 with Mr. Ram Vinay Prasad Singh, AC to GA 12
For the Respondent No. 3 For the Accountant General ====================	: Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate : Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, Advocate ==================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date : 21-01-2021

¶14

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

¶15

Heard Mr. Kripa Nand Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. Shilpa Singh, learned GA 12 along with Mr. Ram Vinay Prasad Singh, learned AC to GA 12 for the State; Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the Accountant General.

¶16

It is not in dispute that due payments to the petitioner have been made except for MACP which has been denied by the respondents.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.8163 of 2020 dt.21-01-2021 2/2

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter be disposed off with liberty to him to move before the Competent Authority with regard to grant of MACP benefit to him.

¶19

In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

¶20

If the petitioner makes a representation for grant of MACP within four weeks from today, before the Competent Authority, the same shall be disposed off, in accordance with law, and a reasoned order shall be passed within four weeks from the date of filing of such representation.

¶21

If it is found that the petitioner is entitled to any further payment, the same shall also be paid to him within six weeks from the date of passing of the order.

¶22

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶23

Anjani/-

¶24

AFR/NAFR U T

Chandra Bhushan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandra Bhushan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Chaudhary @ Umesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Professor Rajeshwar Prasad Roy Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Khushboo Kumari Vs The State of Bihar