Allowed

Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jan 2021CWJC/8796/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, directing the State of Bihar via the Principal Secretary to dispose of the petitioner's representation within two months by a reasoned order.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with direction to Respondent No. 1 to dispose of the petitioner's representation within two months by a reasoned order.

Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8796 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, Aged about 64 years, son of Late Ramjee Prasad, Residence of Village-Mirjapur, Nohta, Fahuha, P.S.-Fatuha, District-Patna, State-Bihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Chairman, Bihar Technical Service Commission (BTSC), Patna.

¶8

The Secretary, Bihar Technical Service Commission (BTSC), Patna.

¶9

The Examination Controller, Bihar Technical Service Commission (BTSC), 19, Harding Road, Patna, Bihar.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Kant Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, GP 5 with Mr. Iqbal Asif Neyazi, AC to GP 5

¶13

=======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶15

Date : 21-01-2021

¶16

The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

¶17

Heard Mr. Ravi Kant Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, learned GP 5 along with Mr. Iqbal Asif Neyazi, learned AC to GP 5 for the State.

¶18

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has filed representation before the respondent no. 1. It was submitted that the writ petition be disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 1 to dispose off such representation.

¶19

Learned counsel for the State is agreeable to such

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.8796 of 2020 dt.21-01-2021 2/2

¶21

suggestion of the petitioner.

¶22

In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed

¶23

off with a direction to the respondent no. 1 to dispose off the representation filed by the petitioner before him, copy of which is Annexure-5 to the writ application, if already not disposed off, latest within two months from today by passing a reasoned order, in accordance with law.

¶24

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶25

Anjani/-

¶26

AFR/NAFR U T

Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Chaudhary @ Umesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Professor Rajeshwar Prasad Roy Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Khushboo Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar