Petitioners, company officials, sought withdrawal of a writ application in Patna High Court after reaching an amicable settlement with respondents during pendency.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6869 of 2021
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 10-09-2021 Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the present writ application both the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, as such, this writ application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw this
writ application.
Permission is granted.
This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
perwez/praful
U
M/s Bibhutipur Farmers Producers Company Ltd.
Ram Naresh Singh
Kiran Devi
UCO Bank
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
