This writ petition challenging non-implementation of a preemption order was disposed of. The court observed no record of the petitioner approaching the authorities for relief and granted liberty to file a representation within two weeks.
Liberty granted to file a representation before Respondent No. 3 within two weeks for redressal of grievances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6490 of 2020
======================================================
Sri Sambhu Thakur, Son of late Ramdeo Thakur, Resident of village and postLakhanpur, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Uday Prakash Shrarma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. D. Kr. Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 29-11-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6490 of 2020 dt.29-11-2021
2/2
heard.
V.K.Pandey/-
| AFR/NAFR | N.A.F.R. |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date | 03.12.2021 |
| Transmission Date | N.A. |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking mandamus for implementation of a preemption order should be disposed of without substantive hearing as no evidence of approaching the authority for redressal is on re
Sri Sambhu Thakur
The State of Bihar
The District Cum Collector, Muzaffarpur
The Deputy Collector land reform Muzaffarpur
Sri Dinesh Thakur
Sri Ram Pramod Thakur
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
