Disposed

Alimuddin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Nov 2021CWJC/6424/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Where the petitioner challenged the inaction of the Deputy Collector regarding a land dispute order, the court directed the Collector to process the pending miscellaneous application filed under Section 15 of the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009, on its merits with hearing, within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the D.C.L.R., Kishanganj to process the miscellaneous application filed on 20.08.2019 on merits with hearing within three months.

Alimuddin Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6424 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Alimuddin Son of Late Md. Kantu Resident of Village- Birnea Tola, P.S.Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj- 855101.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Kishanganj.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Kishanganj.

¶8

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, District- Kishanganj.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division- Kishanganj, DistrictKishanganj.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.

¶11

The Officer-in- Charge, Bahadurganj Police Station, District- Kishanganj.

¶12

Sulindar Sharma son of Late Banarsi Sharma Resident of VillageBahadurganj, Main Road Registry Office, Ward No. 7 (Nagar Panchayat), P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.

¶13

Sandhya Devi Wife of Late Ram Vilas Sharma Resident of VillageBahadurganj, Main Road Registry Office, Ward No. 7 (Nagar Panchayat), P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.

¶14

Pappu Sharma son of Late Ram Vilas Sharma Resident of VillageBahadurganj, Main Road Registry Office, Ward No. 7 (Nagar Panchayat), P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.

¶15

Jittu Sharma son ofLate Ram Vilas Sharma Resident of VillageBahadurganj, Main Road Registry Office, Ward No. 7 (Nagar Panchayat), P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.

¶16

Geeta Sharma wife of Pappu Sharma Resident of Village- Bahadurganj, Main Road Registry Office, Ward No. 7 (Nagar Panchayat), P.S.Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj.

¶17

... ... Respondents

¶18

======================================================

¶19

Appearance :

¶20

For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s:

¶21

Mr. Rashid Izhar, Advocate Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC-19

¶22

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-11-2021

¶23

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.6424 of 2020 dt.29-11-2021 2/4

¶25

Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

¶26

The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner have been claimed in the writ petition -

¶27

“(I) Issuance of writs in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents especially respondent no. 3 to give effect to its own order dated 10.10.2013 and the order passed in Land Dispute Appeal No. 55 of 2014 dated 17.05.2017 passed by the Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea and remove the illegal occupation/nuisance of the Private Respondents from the land situated in MauzaBahadurganj, Revenue Thana No. 359, Bahadurganj within District- Kishanganj bearing plot no. 441 of Khata No. 50 of village- Bvirnea Tola Sameshsar, Circle OfficeBahadurganj.

¶28

(II) Issuance of writ or writs in the nature of mandamus, cdirecting the respondent no. 3 to accept the Registration of Miscellaneous Case approached by the petitioner to be filed before the respondent no. 3 but the office refused to accept the same and has denied the claim of the petitioner of issuing direction for removal of illegal occupation/nuisance of the private respondents.

¶29

(III) For issuance of writ or writs of MANDAMUS, commanding the respondent no. 3 to get the illegal occupation/nuisance of the private respondents removed through himself or through any other Officer of the encroachers after passing an Order under Section 15 of

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.6424 of 2020 dt.29-11-2021 3/4

¶31

the 2009 Act within a time framed and enforece the same as per the provision of Law under the Act.

¶32

(IV) Issuance of such other direction or direction to the respondents authorities to take appropriate punitive action against the private respondents and hand over peaceful possession of the landed property as described above to the petitioner in terms of the Order dated 10.10.2013 passed by D.C.L.R., Kishanganj (respondent no. 3) affirmed by the Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea by Order dated 17.05.2017 passed in Land Dispute Appeal No. 55 of 2014.

¶33

(V) Grant such other relief/reliefs as your Lordships may deem fit and proper.”

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioner specifically presses prayer no. (II) and submits that despite the order dated 10.10.2013 in B.L.D.R. Case No. 35/2013-14 (Annexure-4) having been passed by the D.CL.R., Kishanganj in favour of the petitioner by directing the private respondents to remove the encroachments on the subject land, and that Land Dispute Appeal No. 55 of 2014 filed by the opposite party having been dismissed for default, the land in question continues to be encroached. The petitioner has filed a miscellaneous application under Section 15 of the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 before the D.C.L.R., Kishanganj on 20.08.2019 (Annexure-6) for giving effect to the aforesaid order

¶35

Patna High Court CWJC No.6424 of 2020 dt.29-11-2021 4/4

¶36

dated 10.10.2013, which however is not being proceeded with for

¶37

no apparent reason.

¶38

Learned counsel for the State appears and has been

¶39

heard.

¶40

Having regard to the nature of grievance of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the D.C.L.R., Kishanganj to process the miscellaneous application said to have been filed by the petitioner on 20.08.2019 (Annexure-6) and dispose of the same on its own merits, if still pending, after grant of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously and in any event preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment.

¶41

Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶42

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶43

Ibrar//-

¶44

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	02.12.2021
Transmission Date	N.A.

Alimuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alimuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vathu Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Amrendra Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Sambhu Thakur, Vs The State of Bihar

Brambhdeo Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Naresh Singh Vs The State of Bihar