Allowed

Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Oct 2021CWJC/6243/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the cancellation of their Public Distribution System license. The Court held that the show cause notice issued by the Sub Divisional Officer failed to indicate a proposal for cancellation, violating statutory requirements. Consequently, the Court quashed the cancellation order.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 02.03.2020 cancelling the PDS license is quashed. The petitioner is granted liberty to the Sub Divisional Officer to proceed afresh in accordance with law.

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Consumer Protection | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6243 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rajesh Kumar Son of Vishwanath Prasad Resident of Ward no. 30, Karimchak, Sarkari Bazar, P.s.- Chapra Town, District- Saran (Chapra)

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old secretariat, Patna

¶7

The Collector, Saran, District- saran

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Chapra, District- saran

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Kumar Labh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Upendra Pratap Singh (AC to SC 4) ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 01-10-2021 The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

¶14

The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 02.03.2020 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Chapra whereby and whereunder the PDS license of the petitioner bearing license no. 30/2016 has been cancelled.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has raised a short issue for consideration, to the effect that while issuing the show cause notice dated 29.01.2020, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Chapra did not indicate about any proposal for

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.6243 of 2021(2) dt.01-10-2021 2/3

¶17

cancellation of the license. Thus, no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner, proposing cancellation of the license, as is contemplated under Rule 27(ii) of the Bihar Targeted PDS (Control) Order, 2016 . The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the present case is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court dated 10.7.2018 passed in L.P.A. No. 499 of 2018 (Ram Bachan Ram vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) .

¶18

The learned counsel for the Respondent-State, Sri Upendra Pratap Singh (AC to SC-4), has not disputed the position, as is existing in law.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the materials available on record, this Court finds that the show cause notice dated 29.01.2020, issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Chapra, does not mention about any proposal for cancellation of the license of the petitioner, hence admittedly, no show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner, proposing cancellation of the license, as is contemplated under Rule 27(ii) of the Bihar Targeted PDS (Control) Order, 2016 . Thus, the show cause notice dated 29.01.2020, issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Chapra, is not only contrary to the provisions contained in

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.6243 of 2021(2) dt.01-10-2021 3/3

¶21

clause-27(ii) of the Bihar Targeted PDS Control Order, 2016 but also contrary to the law laid down by this Court in the case of Ram Bachan Ram (supra) , hence, the impugned order dated 02.03.2020 suffers from material legal infirmity on account of the show cause notice dated 29.01.2020 being contrary to law. Consequently, the impugned order dated 02.03.2020, passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Chapra, stands vitiated in the eyes of law, thus, is quashed, however, with liberty to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Chapra to proceed afresh, in accordance with law.

¶22

The writ petition stands allowed.

¶23

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶24

rinkee/-

¶25

Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pravesh Das Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Chandradeep Paswan, Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kalawati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Lal Ram Vs The State of Bihar