The Court disposed of the writ petition without notice, directing respondents to decide the petitioner's claim for refund or time extension regarding a bus stand closure during Covid-19.
Petitioner to be given liberty to decide his claim for refund or time extension regarding the bus stand closure due to Covid-19.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5646 of 2021
======================================================
Sudhir Kumar, Son of Yogendra Mandal, Ward No. 13, Near Primary School, Triveniganj, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay, GA-5 Mr. Ashish Kumar Lal, AC to GA-5 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
2 08-03-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Since the Court is inclined to dispose of the writ application with a direction to respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, the Court does not feel persuaded to issue notice to Zila Parishad, Supaul.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to Covid-19, the petitioner has not been able to operate the Bus stand and, as such, the petitioner deserves consideration of his case sympathetically for extension of time for the Bus stand, Triveniganj or proportional refund of the amount during which the Bus stand was not operational due to Covid-19.
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of
Patna High Court CWJC No.5646 of 2021(2) dt.08-03-2021 2/2
with liberty to the Zila Parishad, Supaul to appropriately decide the claim of the petitioner in the light of the fact that due to Covid-19, the Bus stand was not in operation.
Necessary decision in this regard may be taken by the respondents at the earliest preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uday/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of with liberty to the respondents to decide the petitioner's claim sympathetically in view of Covid-19.
SUDHIR KUMAR
STATE OF BIHAR
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SUPAUL
D.D.C. CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILA PARISHAD SUPAUL
ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
