In a civil writ petition filed belatedly, the Patna High Court held that it is not inclined to grant indulgence. However, liberty was granted to the petitioners to pursue departmental remedies for redressal of their grievance.
Liberty granted to pursue departmental remedy for redressal of grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5251 of 2021
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the belated approach of the petitioners warrants indulgence in granting the writ.
Taposh Kumar Das
Sabir Alam
The State of Bihar
The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar
The Director General of Police, Home Guard, Bihar
The Superintendent of Police, Kishanganj
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
