Ashutosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In this civil writ jurisdiction case, the High Court of Patna dismissed the writ application by default as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner after multiple adjournments.
In this civil writ jurisdiction case, the High Court of Patna dismissed the writ application by default as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner after multiple adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5645 of 2021
======================================================
Ashutosh Kumar S/o Sudheshwar Prasad Yadav Ramnakabad, P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District-Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
default.
Mr. Abbas Haider, learned counsel for the State is
present.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
sanjeev/-
U
Ashutosh Kumar S/o Sudheshwar Prasad Yadav
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Nagar Vikash and Avash, Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court