Partly allowed
Dhananjay Kumar v. The Union of India
Patna HCCWJC/10406/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10406 of 2021
======================================================
Dhananjay Kumar Son of Kamla Rajak R/o Village- Dangraahar, P.s.- Arawal, District- Arwal
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Mr. Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that in view of office objection that the present writ application is not maintainable before this Court, he seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to file an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as
withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
sanjeev/- U
Dhananjay Kumar
Union of India
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court