Disposed

Ruchik Narayan v. The State of Bihar.

Patna HC21 Aug 2021CWJC/5157/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Patna disposed of a writ application deleting four respondents with no objection. The Court permitted the petitioner to file a grievance before the Municipal Commissioner within four weeks and directed disposal by a reasoned order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Deleted respondent nos. 7-10; directed petitioner to file representation within four weeks; directed respondent no. 6 to dispose within three months.

Ruchik Narayan Vs The State of Bihar. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5157 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ruchik Narayan (Male), aged abut 38 years, Son of Late Vishnu Narayan, Resident of Mohalla Thakurbari Road, P.S. Kadam Kuan, District Patna

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department Town Development and Housing, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna

¶9

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶10

The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, Patna, Bihar.

¶11

The Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Jee Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, AC to SC-6 Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 21-08-2021

¶15

Heard Mr. Sheo Jee Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, learned A.C. to S.C. -6 for the State and Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, learned counsel for the Patna Municipal Corporation through video conferencing.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

¶17

delete the name of respondent nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10.

¶18

Permission is granted.

¶19

The name of respondent nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10 are deleted from the array of parties.

¶20

Petitioner has filed this writ application stating therein that in front of the house and landed property of the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.5157 of 2021(2) dt.21-08-2021 2/3

¶22

petitioner bearing plot no. 2192, khata no. 1116 in Mauza -Digha, the respondent- Patna Municipal Corporation has constructed various urinals and toilets thus causing nuisance to the petitioner.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a detailed representation in this regard has been filed before the Executive Officer, Patliputra Anchal at Annexure - 1 Series to the writ petition dated 21/12/2020, but the same is still pending. Learned counsel further submits that he will be filing a detailed representation before the Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation raising his grievance within a period of four weeks and the respondent no. 6 i.e. Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the P.M.C. has got no objection, if such order is passed.

¶25

Regard being had to the submissions made by the parties, the petitioner is permitted to file a detailed representation raising his grievance before the respondent no. -6 i.e. Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation within a period of four weeks and if such representation is filed, the respondent no. – 6 is directed to dispose of the same by a reasoned order in

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.5157 of 2021(2) dt.21-08-2021 3/3

¶27

accordance with law within a further period of three months.

¶28

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ

¶29

application is disposed of.

¶30

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶31

praful/-

¶32

Ruchik Narayan v. The State of Bihar.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruchik Narayan v. The State of Bihar.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkishor Roy Vs The Vice Chancellor

Rudal Bind@Rudal Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Dharm Deo Pandit Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Tileshwari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Baban Sharma Vs The State of Bihar