Dismissed

Baban Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2021CWJC/4655/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought salary, gratuity, and leave encashment differences. State claimed dues were paid. Petitioner requested withdrawal with liberty to approach the Executive Engineer for further amounts. Court granted permission and dismissed the writ application as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to approach the Executive Engineer for any further payments.

Baban Sharma Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4655 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Baban Sharma Son of Late Ram Kishun Sharma, Resident of Qr. N.D.T. 450, Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Planning and Development Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna.

¶7

The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, District- East Champaran.

¶9

¶10

The Chief Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Superintending Engineer, Local Area Engineeringn Organization Circle Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶12

The Executive Engineer Local Are Engineering Organization, Work Division 1, Motihari, District- East Champaran.

¶13

Accountant General (A and E), Bihar,Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, AC to AAG-4 ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 21-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the

¶19

present writ application for a direction to the Respondent Authorities to pay difference of salary, difference of gratuity and difference of leave encashment pursuant to revised pay scale given to the petitioner vide Annexure-2.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State referring to the counter affidavit submits that entire admissible dues of the petitioner has been paid and in support of his statement, he refers to

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.4655 of 2021(2) dt.21-08-2021 2/2

¶22

Annexures -A, B and C series.

¶23

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to file a representation before the Respondent No. 6 i.e. the Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization Work Division I, Motihari, if any further amount is found payable to the petitioner.

¶24

Permission is granted.

¶25

This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

S.Ali/-

¶28

Baban Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baban Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkishor Roy Vs The Vice Chancellor

Rudal Bind@Rudal Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Dharm Deo Pandit Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Tileshwari Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ruchik Narayan Vs The State of Bihar.