Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a pending writ application as his grievance was redressed. The single-judge court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the writ application.
Permission to withdraw the writ application was granted and the writ application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5146 of 2021
======================================================
Uday Ray Son of Pitambar Ray Resident of Village- Sukumarpur, BlockRaghopur, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raja Ram Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Archana Meenakshee, GP-6 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
petitioner and Ms. Archana Meenakshee, learned GP-6 for the State through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pending of this writ application, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
Permission is granted.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5146 of 2021(3) dt.04-09-2021 2/2
This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
S.Ali/-
U
Uday Ray
The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
