Solemn petition in tax dispute challenging non-service of copy under GST Act withdrawn before decision, allowing withdrawal and dismissing petition.
Prayer for permission to withdraw the petition allowed; the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11495 of 2021
======================================================
M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Having registered Office at 4th and 5th Floor, Vasundhara Metro Mall, East Boring Canal Road, P.S. Srikrishnapuri, Patna-800001. through Mr. Nikhil Aggarwal, aged about 45 Years, S/o Kalwant Rai @ Kalwant Aggarwal, R/o Villa C-49, Omaxe Green Valley, Sec. 41-42, Faridabad, P.S. Amarnagar, State Haryana 121003.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anujit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dr. K.N. Singh (ASG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice/Hon’ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.)
2 02-07-2021 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):
“That M/s. Samsung India Electronics Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the petitioner") is constrained to file the present writ petition, challenging the actions of the Respondent No. 3 ("R3"), in uploading the Summary
Patna High Court CWJC No.11495 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021
2/3
of the Order issued under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 142(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017, in Form GST DRC-07 dated 24.02.2021 bearing Reference No. ZD100221013034M (hereinafter referred to as 'impugned summary order) intimating the details of demand amounting to Rs. 4,19,89,661 (comprising of IGST of Rs. 2,62,39,165, CGST of Rs. 78,75,248 and SGST of Rs. 78,75,248) pertaining to the period April 2018 to March 2019, without serving a copy of the order itself which was issued under said Section. Such actions of the Respondent No. 3 in failing to provide a copy of the order which contained the detailed reasoning and proceeding to fasten a tax liability on the Petitioner being in violation of the prescribed procedure laid down under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act read with Rule 142(5) of the CGST Rules,and Principles of Natural Justice, is bad in law and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the petition.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11495 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021 3/3
Prayer allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
K.C.Jha/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit withdrawal of a tax dispute petition challenging a summary demand order for lack of service of copy.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
State of Bihar
Assistant Commissioner of State Tax
Chief Justice
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
