Allowed

Chandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Nov 2021CR. MISC./9634/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the Patna High Court quashed a criminal complaint case pending against the petitioner. The court noted that the petitioner and the wife had reconciled and resumed living together. The application was disposed of with directions to file compromise petitions in related maintenance and divorce cases. Quality is thin as the judgment is a mere disposal order.

What did the court decide?

Complaint Case No.1218 of 2018, including the order taking cognizance dated 23.08.2019, is hereby quashed.

Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9634 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1218 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Kumar Son of Late Avinash Singh Resident of Village - Naromurar, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Nisha Raj Wife of Chandan Kumar, D/O - Uday Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Chare, P.S.- Korma, District- Sheikhpura, Presently resident of New Area Nawada, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP For Opp. Party No. 2 : Mrs. Nisha Raj (in person) ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 16-11-2021 Heard the parties.

¶13

Both the parties are present in Court along with respective counsel.

¶14

I have interacted with the parties. Opposite party no.2 is no more interested in contesting the case as she is staying together with the petitioner and good relation has been established between the parties.

¶15

In that view of the matter, Complaint Case No.1218 of 2018 pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nawada including the order taking cognizance dated 23.08.2019 is hereby quashed.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9634 of 2020(4) dt.16-11-2021 2/2

¶17

It is further submitted by the parties that there are other litigation pending between the parties like maintenance case as well as divorce case.

¶18

If the parties file compromise petition in both the cases in the court below, the same shall be decided at the earliest and not later than 15 (fifteen days) from the date of filing of the compromise petition.

¶19

With the aforesaid observations and direction, this application is disposed of.

¶20

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶21

BT/-

¶22

U T

Chandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sone Lal Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Bhulo Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Suryadev Kumar @ Surdev Kr Vs the State of Bihar