Shahbaj Aalam v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail for petitioner no.2, Amir Khan, in a criminal case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prayer for co-petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for anticipatory bail for petitioner no.2 Amir Khan was rejected. The application for co-petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8081 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2017 Thana- JIRADEI District- Siwan
======================================================
- SHAHBAJ AALAM Son of Shekh Alimullah Resident of Village-Gausi Hatta, P.S.-Barhariya, District-Siwan.
- Amir Khan Son of Samim Khan Resident of Village-Jhakhari Hatta, P.S.Barhariya, District-Siwan.
- Akash Kumar Son of Bechu Chaudhary Resident of Village-Rajghat, P.S.Mirganj, District-Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioner no.2 Amir Khan in PS Case No.83 of 2017.
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail should be allowed when the petitioner apprehends arrest.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shahbaj Aalam
- petitioner
Amir Khan
- petitioner
Akash Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court