Oral order allowing withdrawal of criminal appeal by the appellant who had been arrested, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.
Permission to withdraw the appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2212 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2020 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna
======================================================
RAKESH YADAV @ BRITENIYA YADAV Son of Suro Yadav Resident of Village- Gowasa Sekhpura, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna.
... ... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Arun, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms.Usha Kumari 1, Special PP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 02-11-2021
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of start of normal functioning of the physical court.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has been arrested and as such, this appeal has become infructuous. Accordingly, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2212 of 2021(2) dt.02-11-2021 2/2
connection with Special Case No. 477 of 2020 arising out of Pandarak P.S. Case No. 121 of 2020.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
shahzad/-
U T
Rakesh Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
