Partly allowed

Raj Ballav Mahto @ Raj Balan Mahto @ Raj Valam Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Aug 2021CR. MISC./44785/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought extension of time to surrender for anticipatory bail conditions and permission to withdraw the petition regarding one petitioner taken into custody. The court extended the surrender period and allowed withdrawal for petitioner no. 3.

What did the court decide?

Extension of surrender period by eight weeks; withdrawal of application permitted for petitioner no. 3.

Raj Ballav Mahto @ Raj Balan Mahto @ Raj Valam Mahto Vs the… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44785 of 2021

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37058 of 2020

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2020 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran

¶5

======================================================

¶6

RAJ BALLAV MAHTO @ RAJ BALAN MAHTO @ RAJ VALAM MAHTO Son of Sipahi Mahto Resident of Village - Shobhapur, Police Station - Nayagaon, District - Saran.

¶7

Jitendra Mahto Son of Raj Ballav Mahto @ Raj Balan Mahto @ Raj Valam Mahto Resident of Village - Shobhapur, Police Station - Nayagaon, District - Saran.

¶8

Chhotayee Mahto Son of Raj Ballav Mahto @ Raj Balan Mahto @ Raj Valam Mahto Resident of Village - Shobhapur, Police Station - Nayagaon, District - Saran.

¶9

Kariman Mahto @ Dharmendra Mahto Son of Raj ballav Mahto @ Raj balan mahto @ Raj Valam Mahto Resident of Village - Shobhapur, Police Station - Nayagaon, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C. Jawahar, APP

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 18-08-2021

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶18

counsel for the State through virtual mode.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission

¶20

of the Court to withdraw this application in respect of petitioner no. 3 as he has been taken into judicial custody.

¶21

Permission is accorded.

¶22

The application is dismissed as withdrawn in respect

¶23

of petitioner no. 3.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44785 of 2021(2) dt.18-08-2021 2/3

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶26

The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 15.04.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37058 of 2020 by which the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 37 of 2020 to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Excise, Saran at Chapra and the petitioners were directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of eight weeks.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 submits that due to some unavoidable reasons they could not surrender in the Court below well within time. It is prayed on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 that further time may be extended so that petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 could surrender in the Court below.

¶28

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 and the grounds mentioned in the modification application, the period of surrender of the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 in the Court below is extended for a further period of eight weeks from the date of

¶29

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44785 of 2021(2) dt.18-08-2021 3/3

¶30

receipt/production of a copy of this order. The rest of the conditions stipulated in the order will be same.

¶31

The order dated 15.04.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37058

¶32

of 2020 is modified to the extent as indicated above.

¶33

The modification application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶34

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶35

Pankaj/-

¶36

U T

Raj Ballav Mahto @ Raj Balan Mahto @ Raj Valam Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Ballav Mahto @ Raj Balan Mahto @ Raj Valam Mahto v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bibi Aysa @ Aysa Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Lal Bihari Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Anar Kali Devi @ Anarkali Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar