Allowed

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Aug 2021CR. MISC./30195/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry harassment case under Sections 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The order directs the Company Court to remove defects within four weeks and imposes personal bond conditions along with a requirement to submit bail bonds after normalcy is restored. An option for reconciliation via District Mediation Centre was offered.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail on personal bond to be furnished within twelve weeks; subsequent bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties in eight weeks after normalcy.

Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30195 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2020 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AJAY KUMAR Son of Badree Prasad Resident of Village- Nokha, P.S.Nokha, District- Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukund Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C. Jawahar, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 17-08-2021

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶16

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A , 34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶17

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶18

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30195 of 2021(2) dt.17-08-2021 2/3

¶20

petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶21

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 48 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶23

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶24

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30195 of 2021(2) dt.17-08-2021 3/3

¶26

make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of

¶27

reconciliation or one time settlement.

¶28

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶29

Pankaj/-

¶30

U T

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadam Miyan @ Saddam Miyan @ Sadradam Mian @ Md. Saddam Vs the State of Bihar

Diplip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gurudeo Bind Vs the State of Bihar

Bibi Aysa @ Aysa Vs the State of Bihar

Lal Bihari Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Asrar Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar