The High Court of Patna accorded permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application after the petitioner was arrested during its pendency, dismissing the application as withdrawn via oral order.
Permission accorded to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4477 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2020 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada
====================================================== RAJU CHAUDHARY@ RAJU KUMAR Son of Bajrangi Chaudhary Resident of Village - Ramrayichak, P.S.- Sirdala, Distt.- Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
2 21-09-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this application, since during the pendncy of this application, petitioner has been arrested.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
shailendra/-
U T
Raju Chaudhary@ Raju Kumar
The State of Bihar
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
