Allowed

Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Sept 2021CR. MISC./17438/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order granting bail to the petitioner arrested under Section 304-B/34 IPC of a domestic violence case. The High Court granted release on personal bond due to the petitioner's detention exceeding two years and insufficient progress in the trial, despite a earlier rejection.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of Learned A.D.J.-XI, Kaimur at Bhabua.

Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17438 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2019 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

DHANANJAY KUMAR @ DHANANJAY RAM SON OF RAM AKBAL RAM ALIAS RAM EKBAL RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-JIGINA, PSMOHANIA, DISTRICT-KAIMUR AT BHABHUA

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶5

4 15-09-2021

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶7

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶8

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 248 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner had been rejected by this Court vide order dated 28.02.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12229 of 2020.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.07.2019 i.e. more than two years and there is no substantial progress in the trial.

¶11

A report was called for and the same has been

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17438 of 2021(4) dt.15-09-2021 2/2

¶13

received. From perusal of the same, it appears that out of seven prosecution witnesses, one witness has been examined and the case is running for prosecution evidence.

¶14

Learned A.P.P. for the State does not refute the factual position of the trial.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-XI, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with S.T. No. 248 of 2019 arising out of Mohania P.S. Case No. 248 of 2019/ S.T. No. 223 of 2019.

¶16

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶17

brajesh/-

¶18

U T

Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rama Shankar Dwivedi Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar