Allowed

Ajeet Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Dec 2021CR. MISC./421/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous petition filed seeking bail against offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 504/506. Court granted bail to petitioners upon the condition that the main accused, who already had anticipatory bail, surrenders or is arrested. Pays Rs. 10,000 bond.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail against accused upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, conditional on arrest or surrender of main accused within four weeks.

Ajeet Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.421 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2018 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajeet Kumar Singh, son of late Shiv Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Pipariya, P.O.- Pipariya, P.S.- Mohania, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabua.

¶5

Jitendra Singh Son of Rajendra Singh Resident of Village - Balughat, PostMohania, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabua., At Present resident of Village Sisuwahi, Post- Sisuwahi, P.S.- Lanka, Distt.- Varanasi (U.P)

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶9

Sandhya Devi W/o Pramod Singh Resident of Village - Rupin, P.O.- Amaon, P.S.- Chainpur, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabua.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 06-12-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶16

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 504/506 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Chainpur P..S.Case No.340 of 2018.

¶17

The matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre for exploring the amicable settlement between the parties.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the main accused is Natraj Singh, against whom allegation

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.421 of 2020(3) dt.06-12-2021 2/2

¶20

is that he executed a sale deed in favour of the complainant, but when she went to the place she came to know that the land was not belonging to the said accused. He has further submitted that Natraj Singh has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court under order dated 07.10.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23241 of 2020.

¶21

Considering the fact that the main accused Natraj Singh by putting forth trance submission, has been granted anticipatory bail, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Chainpur P.S.Case No. 340 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶22

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

HR/-

¶24

Ajeet Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeet Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Agrawal Vs Neha Agrawal

Prabhakar Narayan Singh, Vs M/s Sidhnath Press

Kislay Kishore, Vs Hare Ram Singh

Faishal Kamal Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Alam @ Samir Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Dom @ Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar