Guddu Alam @ Samir Alam v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Held, in an oral order, that the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls. The criminal miscellaneous application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Held, in an oral order, that the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls. The criminal miscellaneous application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1248 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2016 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas
======================================================
GUDDU ALAM @ SAMIR ALAM Son of Sahabu Miyan @ Sahabuddin Miyan @ Sahabuddin Alam Resident of Village - Palka, P.S.- Bhabua, District - Kaimur at Bhabua.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
3 06-12-2021 Despite repeated calls none appeared on behalf of
the petitioner.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for non
prosecution.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J)
SONALI/-
U
GUDDU ALAM @ SAMIR ALAM
THE STATE OF BIHAR
NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court