Allowed

Navlesh Ram @ Nablesh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2021CR. MISC./40914/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Police Station Masaurhi Case No. 364 of 2020, noting a compromise between parties. Bail conditions included a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with пара 1 of the order regarding defects.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties; release effective if arrested or surrender within four weeks.

Navlesh Ram @ Nablesh Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40914 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2020 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NAVLESH RAM @ NABLESH RAM S/o Naresh Ram R/o villageKailuchak, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna

¶5

Sunil Kumar S/o Jathu Sao @ Jata Sao R/o village- Kailuchak, P.S.Masaurhi, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 13-12-2021

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Masaurhi P..S.Case No. 364 of 2020.

¶15

As per the FIR, co-accused Bharat Ram and Sunil Kumar assaulted and abused the brother of the informant. When the informant went to their house for persuading them, petitioner no.1, along with co-accused Durgi, assaulted the informant and his brother with lathi, sword etc. and made them injured.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40914 of 2020(3) dt.13-12-2021 2/2

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the parties have compromised the case and counter case and, in this respect, a supplementary affidavit has been filed and in paragraph no.7 of that supplementary affidavit, this fact has been mentioned.

¶18

Considering the fact that both the parties have compromised the case, let petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Masaurhi in connection with Masaurhi P.S.Case No.364 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶19

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶20

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

HR/-

¶22

U T

Navlesh Ram @ Nablesh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navlesh Ram @ Nablesh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pappu Singh @ Pappu Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shankar Tanti Vs the State of Bihar

Bhuneshwar Singh @ Bhuwnesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sadanand Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Rajan Paswan Alias Razan Paswan Vs the State of Bihar