Allowed

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Feb 2021CR. MISC./35727/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from an FIR under Section 394 IPC involving robbery, the Patna High Court, on regular bail application, allowed the bail of the petitioner conditioned upon furnishing bonds and sureties to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35727 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2019 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Kumar S/O Pradeep Mahato @ Pradeep Shah R/O Village - Sonbarsa, P.S. - Sonbarsa, District - Sitamarhi

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.R.B.Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 22-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

This application for regular bail arises out of Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 261 of 2019, disclosing offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The FIR was registered against unknown. Allegedly, three miscreants had intercepted the informant and after having assaulted him with the butt of a pistol, looted cash worth Rs. 1,50,000/-. The petitioner's name transpired during course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused Sikandar Mukhiya.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that name of one Vijay Das has also been disclosed by co-accused Sikandar Mukhiya in his so called confessional statement, who

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35727 of 2020(4) dt.22-02-2021 2/2

¶16

has been allowed regular bail by this Court by an order dated 02.02.2021, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37307 of 2020.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid submission, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount, each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 261 of 2019.

¶18

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶19

Rajesh/-

¶20

U T

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Sah @ Manish Kumar Sah @ Doctor Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Rai @ Prem Yadav @ Prem Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar @ Amarjeet Kumar Das Vs The Union of India

Ravindra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar