Allowed

Ravindra Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Feb 2021CR. MISC./35713/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an application for regular bail under section 307 IPC. The court accepted arguments that existing animosity was the trigger and no repetition of blows was alleged, thus negating intention to murder. Bail was granted on furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Ravindra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35713 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2020 Thana- BISFI (PATAUNA) District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravindra Yadav, Son of Ram Bahadur Yadav, Resident of Village - Chandra Bana, P.S. - Bisfi, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vikramdeo Singh Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 22-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

This application for regular bail arises out of Bisfi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2020, disclosing offence punishable under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

It is alleged that the FIR named accused persons were pressurising the informant’s father to withdraw a criminal case filed by him. It is further alleged that the miscreants had started abusing and assaulting the informant and his father. There is allegation against the petitioner of having hit the informant’s father with an axe causing grievous injuries. The petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2020.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing on behalf o the petitioner has submitted that existing animosity between the parties is the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35713 of 2020(5) dt.22-02-2021 2/2

¶15

apparent reason behind the alleged occurrence leading to lodging of the FIR. He has further submitted that it is evident from the FIR that there is no allegation of repetition of blow by the petitioner, and, therefore, intention to murder is absent.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid submission and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2020, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount, each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Ist, Benipatti, Madhubani, in Bisfi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2020.

¶17

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶18

Rajesh/-

¶19

U T

Ravindra Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Sah @ Manish Kumar Sah @ Doctor Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Rai @ Prem Yadav @ Prem Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Kumar @ Amarjeet Kumar Das Vs The Union of India

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar