Roosan Khan @ Raushan Khan v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Patna rejected the bail petition of a petitioner arrested under the NDPS Act and Arms Act. The court noted the recovery of narcotics but allowed the petitioner to renew bail after framing of charges.
What did the court decide?
Bail petition rejected; liberty granted to renew prayer for bail after framing of charge.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35513 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2020 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== ROOSAN KHAN @ RAUSHAN KHAN SON OF NEJAMUL HAQUE KHAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - ISLAMIA MOHALLA, WARD NO 12, POLICE STATION - GOPALGANJ (TOWN), DISTRICT - GOPALGANJ
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan Mr. Irshad Ahmad Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 08-03-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2020 in connection with Gopalganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 158/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399/402/414/ of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 8(c), 21(a) of the NDPS Act.
As per the prosecution case, on 07.03.2020 at about 11:30 A.M., on a secret information that 6-7 miscreants were planning to commit dacoity at Islamiya Mohalla in front of Gauri Sah shop, a raid was conducted and 5 persons including
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35513 of 2020(4) dt.08-03-2021 2/2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Roosan Khan @ Raushan Khan
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Prabhat Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court