Allowed

Gorelal Yadav @ Gorelal Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Sept 2021CR. MISC./33794/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in an excise case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The bail was conditional, to be furnished within 12 weeks of restoration of normalcy, with specific surety requirements.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail on personal bond, contingent upon furnishing bail bonds with sureties within eight weeks after normalcy is restored.

Gorelal Yadav @ Gorelal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33794 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

GORELAL YADAV @ GORELAL KUMAR S/O RAM BALAK YADAV R/O VILLAGE-CHETA BIGHA, P.S-AKBARPUR, DISTRICT-NAWADA.

¶5

SHANKAR YADAV @ SHANKAR KUMAR YADAV S/O RAMBALAK YADAV R/O VILLAGE-CHETA BIGHA, P.S-AKBARPUR, DISTRICTNAWADA.

¶6

RANJEET YADAV @ RANJEET KUMAR S/O SAHDEV YADAV R/O VILLAGE-CHETA BIGHA, P.S-AKBARPUR, DISTRICT-NAWADA.

¶7

ASHOK YADAV @ ASHOK KUMAR S/O LATE KAILASH YADAV R/O VILLAGE-CHETA BIGHA, P.S-AKBARPUR, DISTRICT-NAWADA.

¶8

AJAY YADAV @ AJAY KUMAR S/O NARAYAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE-NANDLAL BIGHA, P.S-AKBARPUR, DISTRICT-NAWADA.

¶9

... ... Petitioner/s

¶10

Versus

¶11

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-09-2021

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State through virtual mode.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Government Official Case No. 250 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33794 of 2021(2) dt.03-09-2021 2/3

¶18

The prosecution case, in short, is that 400 kg. Jawa Mahua and 50 liters wine is recovered.

¶19

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against them. They have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 400 kg. Jawa Mahua and 50 liters wine is recovered from an open place near Highway. The names of the petitioners have transpired in this case on the basis of secret information. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33794 of 2021(2) dt.03-09-2021 3/3

¶23

Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Nawada in connection with G.O.Case No. 250 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioners shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶25

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶26

A.K.V.//-

¶27

U T

Gorelal Yadav @ Gorelal Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gorelal Yadav @ Gorelal Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gunjan Kumar @ Gunjan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Ram Sahni @ Shreeram Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Sahni @ Arbind Sahni @ Arbind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jalindra Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Tanushka Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Prasad Vs the State of Bihar